U.S. House Democrats tore into the Trump administration’s annual budget request for the Department of Education at a hearing on Capitol Hill Thursday.
The administration’s proposal to slash the department’s budget in the next fiscal year is dead on arrival and amounts to an effort to privatize public education, they said.
The target of their ire was Education Secretary Betsy DeVos, who testified before the House Appropriations Subcommittee on Labor, Health and Human Services, Education and Related Agencies.
DeVos defended the proposal, saying that spending more money on education will not improve U.S. students’ lackluster academic performance, but that freedom and local control would.
“I’m not out to privatize anything about education,” she said. “I’m out to make sure every student’s education is personalized, individualized for them.”
Maryland Republican Rep. Andrew P. Harris backed her up. “Some people would suggest that repeating the same thing that doesn’t work is insanity,” he said. “That’s exactly what we’re doing in the United States.”
But the subcommittee chairwoman, Rep. Rosa DeLauro (D-Conn.), disputed the “false premise” that public schools are failing despite federal investments in them.
“Contrary to your claims, the nation’s public education system … has witnessed significant progress of all groups of students over the last 30 years,” she said. While acknowledging disparities in outcomes across different populations, she cited gains in math and reading scores according to the National Assessment of Educational Progress.
Nearly 57 million students attend primary and secondary schools in the United States, 90% of whom are in public schools, according to the National Center for Education Statistics.
“The solution is not less resources, nor is it more privatization,” she said.
A $6 billion cut
Overall, the Trump administration is seeking to cut the department’s total funding by $6 billion in fiscal year 2021, a reduction of nearly 8% from current levels, according to a report by the Center for American Progress. It would also dedicate $5 billion in tax credits for private school vouchers and eliminate dozens of education programs, many of which serve disadvantaged and vulnerable youth.
Wisconsin Democratic Rep. Mark Pocan declared himself a proud product of public schools — and zeroed in on DeVos’ advocacy for charter schools, which he suggested poses a conflict of interest because her husband founded one in Michigan.
Charter schools fare worse, on average than public schools on measures of academic performance, he said, and some 40% that receive public grants close or fail. “That’s an F grade,” he said, and yet you’re advocating for more support for charter schools.
A 2019 Washington Post story cited data from an advocacy group that found more than 35% of charter schools funded by the federal Charter School Program (CSP) between 2006 and 2014 either never opened or were shut down.
DeVos disputed Pocan’s data but said she did not know the rate of charter school closures.
“You’re the secretary of Education and you don’t have this?” Pocan pressed.
In another heated exchange, Pocan pressed DeVos over whether she supported a federally funded charter school chain in Texas that reportedly intended to lease a private jet and buy other luxury items. The plan to lease the jet was canceled after it was reported in the media, Pocan said.
DeVos declined to answer, prompting Pocan to remark: “If the secretary of education can’t answer a yes or no question, I don’t know why you can be the secretary.”