Senate Passes Judicial Transparency Act, Gives Preliminary Approval to Coal Tar Sealant Ban
The Maryland Senate quietly passed an amended version of Senate Bill 392, the Judicial Transparency Act of 2022, Monday evening.
That bill is a top legislative priority for Gov. Lawrence J. Hogan Jr. (R), and as originally introduced would have required a comprehensive annual report on the sentencing decisions by individual judges, including details on sentences outside of the Maryland Sentencing Guidelines.
The bill was amended to remove its emergency status and aggregate the published sentencing data by county or circuit to not single out individual judges.
Republican lawmakers preferred the more detailed reporting requirement, but the amended bill ultimately passed unanimously out of the Senate during a Monday evening floor session.
Hogan has introduced versions of the bill since 2019. That year, an amended judicial reporting bill passed the Senate late in the legislative session, but did not move forward in the House.
Republican amendments to coal tar sealant bill fail
Senate Bill 372, introduced by Sen. Cheryl C. Kagan (D-Montgomery), would ban the use of certain coal tar sealant products on driveways and parking areas. The bill specifically bans people from selling or applying coal tar sealing products with high amounts of more than 0.100% polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) to driveways and parking areas starting Oct. 1, 2023.
Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons are chemicals that occur naturally in coal, crude oil, and gasoline, and result from burning coal, oil, gas, wood, garbage, and tobacco, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. According to the CDC, those chemicals can cause blood and liver problems with large amounts of exposure, and “scientists consider several of the PAHs and some specific mixtures to be cancer-causing chemicals.”
Sen. Johnny Ray Salling (R-Baltimore County) took issue with the bill’s fines — up to $2,500 for each violation up to a total of $100,000 — and introduced an amendment to lower those penalties. Salling called the fines “extremely high” and worried they could have a detrimental effect to small businesses, and sought to lower the fines to $1,000 for each violation up to a total of $25,000.
Sen. Paul G. Pinsky (D-Prince George’s) pushed back on Salling’s amendment, and said the fines are meant to ensure the bill is enforced and that people don’t use the banned coal tar sealant products.
“We want to make sure when it says it can’t be used, it can’t be used,” Pinsky said.
Kagan said many major hardware stores don’t even carry the products that would be banned by the bill for fear of lawsuits.
“This is not easy stuff to find anymore,” she said.
Salling’s amendment was ultimately voted down 15-30.
Salling introduced another amendment that would’ve removed the term “parking area” from the bill, arguing that parking areas should be specifically defined, but that effort was likewise rejected in a 15-30 vote. Pinsky said banning the use of those sealants on driveways but allowing them in parking areas would “defeat the purpose” of the bill.