Skip to main content
Justice

Safety for judges to be top priority, according to Maryland lawmaker

Getty Images

By Kate Ryan

Maryland State Sen. William Smith said he’ll bring back a bill designed to protect judges in the upcoming legislative session.

Smith (D-Montgomery) chairs the Senate’s Judicial Proceedings Committee and said he expects the bill, which would shield the home addresses of the state’s judges from being posted on the internet, will be the first bill to get a vote before his committee. The bill, Senate Bill 221, passed in the Senate during the 2023 General Assembly session but stalled in the House.

Smith said the recent killing of Washington County Judge Andrew Wilkinson has renewed calls to increase safety measures for judges. Wilkinson was found shot to death in front of his Hagerstown home Oct. 19. He had ruled against 49-year-old Pedro Argote in a custody case earlier that day.

Argote, who was named as a suspect in the judge’s killing, was found dead in a wooded area of Williamsport on Thursday morning. Washington County Sheriff Brian Albert (D) did not comment on the cause of Argote’s death, saying that is currently under investigation.

Argote’s body was taken to the medical examiner’s office in Baltimore for an autopsy.

Smith said one of the first things he thought of when he learned that a Maryland judge had been killed outside his home last week was the testimony he heard from Chief Justice of the Maryland Supreme Court Matthew Fader during a hearing in Annapolis in February.

Fader told lawmakers in Annapolis that the very nature of their jobs puts judges at risk “of personal attack from disgruntled litigants.” He referred to the protests in front of the homes of U.S. Supreme Court Justices and added, “If those addresses can be found, think of the ease of finding the home addresses of the judge who took away custody of your children or sentenced your child or fiancé to prison and how upset those individuals can be.”

Fader testified in favor of the bill that would require anyone who posted a judge’s address on the internet to remove that information within 72 hours.

Speaking to WTOP on Thursday, Smith called Fader’s comments from the February hearing, “unfortunately prescient.”

“I’ve had protests outside of my house, my private residence, and so I’m keenly aware of some of the concerns” that other officials may have, said Smith. He explained that the immediacy of the impact of a judge’s ruling can escalate the risks to members of the judiciary and their families.

Smith explained he’ll reintroduce a measure similar to the bill introduced in the last legislative session.

“Something akin to this would be the address confidentiality program” that’s granted to survivors of domestic violence and people in witness protection programs, said Smith.

During the news conference where Sheriff Albert announced that Argote’s body had been found, he was asked about concerns over security for judges. He said law enforcement in Washington County “and other counties I know have changed” some of their protocols, but declined to be specific.

“I don’t want to speak on how they’re doing things, but I’m sure we’re going to have discussions in the future on how to protect the judges a little bit better,” he said.

As part of Maryland Matters’ content sharing agreement with WTOP, we feature this article from Kate Ryan. Click here for the WTOP News website.

REPUBLISHING TERMS

Our stories may be republished online or in print under Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. We ask that you edit only for style or to shorten, provide proper attribution and link to our website. Please see our republishing guidelines for use of photos and graphics.

If you have any questions, please email [email protected].

To republish, copy the following text and paste it into your HTML editor.
Safety for judges to be top priority, according to Maryland lawmaker