Raskin Joins With Fellow Dems to Launch Impeachment Inquiry

    U.S. House Democrats edged closer to Thursday to launching formal impeachment proceedings against President Trump.

    The House Judiciary Committee voted 24-17 along party lines to adopt a resolution laying out procedures for an impeachment investigation in the committee.

    Democratic Rep. Jamie Raskin, the only Maryland representative on the committee, voted in favor of the resolution.

    The vote came after two hours of heated debate over Democrats’ motivations. The committee’s Democratic leadership insisted lawmakers are moving cautiously and responsibly before deciding whether to formally recommend articles of impeachment.

    “This committee is engaged in an investigation that will allow us to determine whether to recommend articles of impeachment with respect to President Trump,” said Judiciary Chairman Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.).

    Nadler stressed that the committee’s investigation will go beyond charges that Trump obstructed justice during former special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into Russian election meddling. Democrats also intend to investigate allegations of “federal election crimes, self dealing, violations of the constitution’s emoluments clause and a failure to defend our nation from current and future attacks by foreign adversaries,” Nadler said.

    More than half of the U.S. House Democrats have said they support moving ahead with a formal impeachment inquiry, according to a New York Times review. Michigan Rep. Justin Amash was the lone House Republican to endorse an impeachment inquiry, but he left the GOP in July, declaring himself an independent.

    Republicans on the Judiciary Committee accused their colleagues of tip-toeing around launching impeachment proceedings, an issue that divides the Democratic caucus and that some moderate members fear could hurt the party’s messaging heading into 2020.

    “Really what we have is a walk down the yellow brick road,” said Georgia Rep. Doug Collins, the top Republican on the Judiciary Committee. “The Emerald City is impeachment and my colleagues are desperate to get there, they have been desperate since last November when they won the majority.”

    Committee Democrats shrugged off their colleagues’ criticisms about semantics and procedure.

    “Yes, we are in an impeachment investigation,” said Rep. Mary Gay Scanlon (D-Pa.). “Have you not been reading the proceedings? I don’t think there’s a question. It’s an investigation.”

    Some have labeled the process an impeachment inquiry; others call it an impeachment investigation. “There’s no legal difference between these terms and I no longer care to argue about the nomenclature,” Nadler said.

    “The conduct under investigation poses a threat to our democracy. We have an obligation to respond to this threat and we are doing so.”

    [email protected]