Skip to main content
Energy & Environment

Latest Bay report card: Middling health but signs of progress

U.S. Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) addresses state officials and environmental leaders Tuesday as the 2022 report card on Chesapeake Bay health is unveiled along the Potomac River in Alexandria, Va. Photo by Josh Kurtz.

In Maryland, it’s easy to forget that the Chesapeake Bay is more than just the wide, glittering body of water that cleaves the state roughly in half.

The bay watershed is in fact a complicated network of land and waterways spread over six states and the District of Columbia, through a variety of topography, taking in different cultures, economies and political dynamics. Which is why some of Maryland’s top officials, including U.S. Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D), found themselves along the banks of the Potomac River in Alexandria, Va., on Tuesday, to discuss the health of the Chesapeake Bay.

“Welcome to Virginia. But a heavy Maryland presence,” observed Travis Voyles, the Old Dominion’s secretary of Natural and Historic Resources.

Van Hollen acknowledged the anomaly.

“It takes a lot to get this Marylander to this side of the Potomac River,” he said. “But this occasion is one of those moments.”

The occasion was the annual release of the report card on bay health from the University of Maryland Center for Environmental Sciences (UMCES).

The topline narrative for 2022 is that overall bay health remains at a C, which is where it has been for the last several years. But on a variety of fronts, UMCES scientists said, bay health is improving, and the report card helps reveal where the success stories and the challenges are.

Of the seven indicators the environmental center uses, there were improvements in water clarity, nitrogen, phosphorus, and aquatic grasses. Although conditions in the bay overall are improving, many bay tributaries still have poor scores, and scores are particularly bad in many Eastern Shore watersheds.

Watershed health was scored in three categories: ecological, societal, and economic health. In 2022, ecological earned a B-minus, societal scored a C, and economic scored a C. Overall, the ecological, social, and economic conditions on the Eastern Shore of Maryland and Virginia are worse than other regions across all three categories.

Increasingly, UMCES researchers aren’t looking just at scientific data, water quality and aquatic life to assess bay health. They’re also trying to measure how every category they study impacts the millions of people living in the bay watershed.

“We need healthy communities to achieve a healthy bay,” said Bill Dennison, UMCES vice president for Science Application.

Assigning letter grades to the health of the bay’s waterways, land use policies and economic conditions may seem like a gimmick. But it’s also a way to get a measure of accountability from federal, state and local leaders and the various industries that impact bay health.

“Report cards are critical for holding people accountable but they’re also important for communicating with people,” said Josh Kurtz, secretary of Maryland’s Department of Natural Resources.

It’s also aspirational for environmental leaders, said Serena McIlwain, Maryland’s secretary of the Environment.

“We’re A students,” she said. “We won’t be happy until we get all A’s.”

(The UMCES report card is one periodic assessment of Bay health. The Chesapeake Bay Foundation’s State of the Bay report card offered a D+ grade earlier this year.)

The big reveal from UMCES this year took place at the Washington Sailing Marina at Daingerfield Island in Alexandria, on property owned by the National Park Service. Planes flying in and out of Reagan National Airport threatened to drown out the speakers from time to time  and so did a few honking Canada geese.

The annual bay report card comes as states in the bay watershed, along with Washington, D.C., scramble to meet federally mandated pollution reduction goals by 2025 — and most jurisdictions are expected to fall short to one degree or another. But even so, UMCES leaders said, it’s still important for states to try to reach them, and to look beyond 2025 and to next steps for improving bay health.

“The nutrient diet is working,” Dennison said. “We just need to tighten our belts and keep improving.”

Scores from the University of Maryland Center for Environmental Sciences report card on Chesapeake Bay health.

Statewide politics play a role in the health of the bay. While a new Democratic administration in Annapolis isn’t quite five months old, in Virginia, Republicans have been running state government for the past year and a half after eight years of Democratic rule. Voyles, Virginia’s secretary of Natural and Historic Resources, said Republican Gov. Glenn Youngkin remains committed to bay health and conservation, and accused the administration’s predecessors of not being transparent about what it would take for Virginia to achieve its bay cleanup goals.

“On day one, Gov. Youngkin told me, he is a conservative, and conservation is a big part of being a conservative,” Voyles said.

He also noted that the absence of agricultural representatives at the event Tuesday, calling them “a key partner” in the push for better bay health.

Voyles said the Youngkin administration is pushing to allocate 20% of the state’s discretionary spending on natural resources and restoration. “He’s really showing that this is a bipartisan issue,” he said.

On the environmental justice front

For the first time, the 2022 report card also sought to track the environmental justice challenges in the bay watershed, which has some of the nation’s poorest areas, in cities like Baltimore, in Appalachia, and along the Delmarva Peninsula.

The index characterizes the cumulative impacts and patterns of environmental injustice across the watershed, considering such social factors such as poverty, race, ethnicity, and pre-existing health conditions, which can increase these impacts. Tracked by Census tract, the results were mixed.

But it will be a few years before UMCES is ready to assign letter grades on the environmental justice front, or use the index to help calculate the overall health of the bay.

“We’re not there yet,” Dennison said. “It’s new. We’re still digging into it, trying to figure out the complexity of what we’re finding.”

Van Hollen said the federal government can help pull together the cleanup goals and efforts of states and other shareholders.

“When you have a watershed that encompasses six states and the District of Columbia and knows no boundaries, it’s important that you have a federal presence,” he said.

The federal government’s Chesapeake Bay Program provides $92 million annually, and a new program within the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has a program that provides $8 million a year to sustain lands that surround the bay. Additionally, the big federal infrastructure spending bill has earmarked $238 million for bay cleanup over five years.

But Van Hollen and other speakers Tuesday said climate change is jeopardizing the progress the state and federal governments are making in combating bay pollution. He likened it to trying to run up an escalator.

“We’re running faster to stay in place with climate change,” said Martha Shimkin, deputy director of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Chesapeake Bay office, picking up on the metaphor.

Editor’s note: Maryland Natural Resources Secretary Josh Kurtz is no relation to Josh Kurtz of Maryland Matters.


Our stories may be republished online or in print under Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. We ask that you edit only for style or to shorten, provide proper attribution and link to our website. Please see our republishing guidelines for use of photos and graphics.

If you have any questions, please email editor Danielle Gaines at [email protected].

To republish, copy the following text and paste it into your HTML editor.


Creative Commons License AttributionCreative Commons Attribution
Latest Bay report card: Middling health but signs of progress