Biden Banks on Md. Offshore Wind Projects to Help Curb Climate Change

Two wind turbines, each as tall as the Washington Monument, stand sentinel 27 miles off the coast of Virginia, the nation’s first offshore wind installation in federal waters.

The pilot project began producing power last October but is just the beginning for an industry poised for massive growth over the next decade — including in Maryland. Longtime conflicts with the fishing industry remain, as well as some landowners, but with the help of a major push from the Biden administration, offshore wind may finally advance in the Atlantic.

Dominion Energy, Virginia’s state utility, plans to install nearly 200 more ocean turbines east of Cape Henry over the next five years. And developers have permits pending for 10 more offshore wind projects along the East Coast, from North Carolina to Maine.

The Biden administration wants to buoy the industry. Last month, the administration announced a $3 billion plan to expand offshore wind.

The ambitious goal is to generate 30 gigawatts of offshore wind power by the end of the decade, enough to power more than 10 million homes and cut 78 million metric tons of carbon dioxide emissions. That’s roughly the carbon equivalent of taking 17 million cars off the road for a year.

Offshore wind represents an opportunity for the Biden administration to address two major goals: reducing carbon emissions and creating jobs.

“Nowhere is the scale of that opportunity clearer than for offshore wind,” National Climate Advisor Gina McCarthy said in announcing the new plan.

The projects could support tens of thousands of jobs, from maintenance at sea to steel production far inland.

There is just one other offshore wind project currently online in the United States: five turbines in state waters off the coast of Block Island, R.I.

The industry has more proposals in the works, including two off the shores of Ocean City.

One is US Wind Maryland, a 270 megawatt farm planned 17 miles offshore. The other is Skipjack Wind Farm, a 120 megawatt farm off the coast of Delaware to the Maryland state line. Danish company Ørsted’s plans for the site include 10 wind turbines.

U.S. Wind Maryland and Skipjack are each close to Ocean City and come under the purview of the Maryland Public Service Commission and the federal Bureau of Ocean Energy Management. Both projects are slated for completion in 2024 but still have reviews and approvals pending.

Ocean City officials have supported clean energy from offshore wind, with caveats. The town’s concern has been the size and proximity of the turbines. They want it to be “green and unseen,” and have launched several lobbying campaigns to stall or defeat the projects.

Last year, Ørsted agreed to reduce the number of turbines and move them from 19 miles offshore to 22 miles offshore — a victory for Ocean City. The bigger concern for the coastal city now lies with US Wind’s project, which could place turbines that are taller than the Washington Monument 17 miles from shore. The Maryland Public Service Commission has not yet approved the taller turbines — though it did approve taller turbines for the Skipjack project last summer. Ocean City officials are pushing for the company to site the turbines more than 20 miles offshore, which would require BOEM to open a new lease area.

Together, the two offshore wind projects could create nearly 4,000 jobs during development and construction and another 4,000 jobs during operation, according to estimates from Ørsted and US Wind. The two companies also plan to invest nearly $100 million in facility upgrades, ports and fabrication facilities in Maryland, which could bolster the state as a regional hub for offshore wind construction. Ørsted has said it will assemble the turbines at the old Sparrows Point steel plant in Baltimore County.

As part of the Biden administration’s rollout of policies to support offshore wind, Ørsted agreed to share ocean mapping and other data it collects with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

Two other major wind projects are also on tap for the Atlantic: A research project floating turbine in Maine and North Carolina’s Kitty Hawk Wind Energy Area, 27 miles off the coast of the Outer Banks.

“This is a once-in-a-generation opportunity,” said Laura Morton of the American Clean Power Association, an industry group. “We can provide clean energy, slash carbon emissions and create jobs.”

‘It is unprecedented’

The administration’s announcement represents a significant turning point for the nascent offshore wind industry.

Representatives from the White House and four federal agencies — Interior, Commerce, Transportation and Energy — rolled out programs to support offshore wind.

Among other things, the administration said it would speed permits for projects along the East Coast, invest in research and development, offer federal loan guarantees for offshore wind development, and invest in port improvements around the country to make it easier to build new offshore wind facilities.

“It is unprecedented and shows a recognition of how complex offshore wind is, and that it takes a lot of pieces to come together to make it work,” said Catherine Bowes, program director for offshore wind for the National Wildlife Federation.

The National Wildlife Federation, like many other environmental groups, supports offshore wind for its unique potential to provide massive amounts of clean power.

“We truly don’t believe that we can meet the climate and energy goals that both people and wildlife need without responsible offshore wind,” Bowes said.

Europe erected the first offshore wind turbines 20 years ago and is the world leader in offshore wind. The industry has been slower to get off the ground in the United States, where it has faced regulatory hurdles and opposition from the fishing industry and some onshore landowners.

The first attempt at offshore wind in the United States was mired in conflict.

Developers gave up on the Cape Wind project in 2017, after multiple lawsuits and years of back-and-forth on permitting and plans. The project in tony Nantucket Sound off Massachusetts met opposition from high-profile homeowners nearby, including members of the Kennedy family and businessman William Koch, a rare alliance.

The Obama administration promoted offshore wind as part of its climate plan, but did not coordinate programs among agencies to support the industry. Many pending permits sat in the doldrums during the Trump administration, which did not prioritize renewable energy.

Biden administration officials say they will expedite the regulatory process. The Bureau of Ocean Energy Management committed to review at least 16 construction and operations plans for pending projects by 2025 and advance new lease sales.

Shift in the political winds

Several key factors make offshore wind more viable now than ever before.

The development of bigger, more efficient turbines means that offshore wind can produce more energy at lower prices. New technology also allows for development farther offshore, capitalizing on stronger winds and reducing some of the conflicts with coastal communities and wildlife.

And states are increasingly looking offshore as an economic and environmental windfall.

Last fall, Gov. Lawrence J. Hogan Jr. (R) and his counterparts in Virginia and North Carolina signed a joint memorandum of understanding to work together as a three-state hub for offshore wind energy—an attempt to create an attractive environment for business investment and compete with the Northeast’s market.

In North Carolina, the state’s Department of Commerce commissioned a report, released in March, that said the state’s manufacturers could profit from the “rapidly developing market” for offshore wind. The analysis estimated a $100 billion market for development and construction alone.

The existing projects in the United States have partly relied on European ships and manufacturers. But as the industry grows, it could spur manufacturing that stretches into America’s heartland.

For example, Virginia’s Dominion Energy is building the first U.S.-made vessel to install offshore wind turbines. Domestic steel operations in Alabama and West Virginia are shipping steel to a Texas shipyard to build the vessel.

Worries about marine life, fishing

But offshore wind has not yet resolved conflicts with the longest-standing industry of the sea: fishing.

As state and federal leaders push for more offshore development, fishing groups have concerns with both the process and the implementation.

They are worried the projects could affect marine life. And they argue regulators have not included them in a meaningful way when developing plans—especially because one offshore wind project can affect fishing for boats that might not be based at ports nearby.

“We need to mitigate impacts to fishing, and essentially fishing concerns have been completely ignored. We are still in the exact same place, asking for the things we have been asking for the last 10 years,” said Annie Hawkins, executive director of the Responsible Offshore Development Alliance, a broad coalition of fishing groups from all over the U.S.

For example, the captains from five boats that fish for black sea bass and conch sent a letter to Dominion Energy asking the company to limit construction during certain times that are key for the fishery, collect more baseline data, and commit to compensation when fishing is closed.

Nowhere is the conflict more pronounced than in Maine, where fishing and lobster boats circled around a proposed research area in protest in March.

Gov. Janet Mills (D) has tried to walk the line on the issue. She is counting on offshore wind to help Maine meet climate mitigation goals. But in response to the pushback, she proposed a 10-year moratorium on wind projects in state waters in January. She still supports projects in federal waters, further offshore.

Supporters of the industry say it is possible to design projects with consideration for fishing interests.

“By far the biggest threat to ocean life is climate change, and the trajectory we are on now is almost inconceivably damaging to the ocean.” said Miriam Goldstein, director of Ocean Policy at the liberal-leaning Center for American Progress.

“The wind resources off the coast and near population centers—that is an opportunity I don’t believe we can overlook. Deploying that in a smart way, with fishermen at the table, is among the most important things we can do to address the climate emergency.”

And in Maryland, the Ocean City council has raised concerns that the two proposed wind projects could affect the horseshoe crab population — a key part of the ecosystem. Horseshoe crabs are a food source for endangered birds and a major source of income for fishermen, who sell them for use in the medical industry, including for vaccines.

Congressional action

Congress is also getting in on the action. Lawmakers on Capitol Hill introduced three different offshore wind bills this year.

Offshore wind is part of large green energy tax incentive legislation from Democrats. Another more targeted offshore wind proposal would create career training grants for colleges or labor organization.

Rep. Elaine Luria (D-Va.), whose Hampton Roads district could see new jobs and development from Dominion’s offshore project, also announced the creation of a Congressional Offshore Wind Caucus last month.

“Increasing offshore wind production so that we can create high-paying clean energy jobs and reduce our dependence on fossil fuels shouldn’t be a partisan issue,” Luria said in an email this week. “Offshore wind is critical to strengthening our economy and improving the environment.”

[email protected]

Allison Winter is a freelance reporter based in Washington, D.C. Josh Kurtz of Maryland Matters contributed to this report.