Supreme Court Rejects Trump Administration Challenge to DACA

Pro-immigration demonstrators, including those from the Maryland group CASA, in front of the Supreme Court Thursday. Photo by Drew Angerer/Getty Images

The U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday salvaged an Obama-era program that has allowed hundreds of thousands of young, unauthorized immigrants known as “Dreamers” to remain in the country without immediate fear of deportation.

In a 5-4 decision, Chief Justice John Roberts sided with the court’s liberal wing in finding that the Trump administration broke the law in 2017 when it rescinded the program, known as Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, or DACA.

Roberts wrote the majority opinion and was joined by Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Elena Kagan, Stephen Breyer and Sonia Sotomayor.

The court held that the U.S. Department of Homeland Security’s decision to end the program was “arbitrary and capricious” and therefore in violation of the Administrative Procedure Act.

“We do not decide whether DACA or its rescission are sound policies,” Roberts wrote. “‘The wisdom’ of those decisions ‘is none of our concern.’

But the department, he said, “failed to consider the conspicuous issues of whether to retain forbearance and what if anything to do about the hardship to DACA recipients. That dual failure raises doubts about whether the agency appreciated the scope of its discretion or exercised that discretion in a reasonable manner.”

The ruling drew cheers from liberal lawmakers and advocates across the country.

“By rejecting the Trump administration’s illegal attempt to end DACA, the Supreme Court provided a critical measure of relief to DACA recipients and their families at a time when they — like all Americans — are experiencing significant fear and uncertainty as a result of the coronavirus pandemic,” Neera Tanden, president and CEO of the Center for American Progress, said in a statement.

CASA, the Hyattsville-based immigrants’ rights group, which had demonstrators in front of the Supreme Court Thursday, issued a significantly more succinct statement on Twitter: “WE WON!!!”

Justice Clarence Thomas called the ruling “mystifying” in a dissenting opinion. “Today’s decision must be recognized for what it is: an effort to avoid a politically controversial but legally correct decision,” he wrote.

The ruling will likely inflame partisan tensions ahead of the 2020 presidential contest. It comes days after the court issued an unexpected ruling protecting LGBTQ workers from job discrimination.

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) called the pair of rulings “a bright ray of sunshine” during difficult times. “This is a wonderful, wonderful day,” he said in a statement.

Trump acknowledged the two rulings on Twitter Thursday.

“Do you get the impression that the Supreme Court doesn’t like me?” he wrote.

The DACA program was created in 2012 to allow certain immigrants who arrived in the United States before age 16 to apply for temporary protection from deportation and work permits.

About 700,000 people have participated in the program, according to the court. A 2017 survey of DACA recipients found that nearly all respondents were either employed or in school, according to the Center for American Progress.

President Trump vowed on the campaign trail to “end” the program. His administration made good on his promise in 2017, but lower courts blocked the decision from taking effect.

The administration could try to end the program again, the court noted. If it does, it will have to do so in a way that complies with federal law governing such decisions.

Last June, the U.S. House passed legislation that would safeguard the program and provide a pathway to citizenship for Dreamers. The bill has not been taken up in the U.S. Senate.

Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) demanded that Congress “move forward with permanent protections for Dreamers and TPS recipients — and pass the Dream and Promise Act now. We will not back off this fight.”

State Del. Joseline Peña-Melnyk (D-Prince George’s) said some immigrant families will now be able to sleep better.

“I think that it’s really very positive –– a wonderful decision given what’s happening in this country and how divided we are,” she said. “I know some of these kids personally. And today they were crying, they were breathing with a sigh of relief. These are our neighbors. These are our children here. So they can sleep a lot better tonight.”
Bruce DePuyt contributed to this report.

[email protected]