Skip to main content
Energy & Environment Working & the Economy

Razing Ellicott City Buildings Could Be ‘Counterproductive,’ Ball Says

A scene from Main Street on Ellicott City, shortly after the second of two major floods in 2018. Photo by Neal Augenstein/WTOP

As part of Maryland Matters’ content sharing agreement with WTOP Radio, we feature this article from Neal Augenstein.

The newly elected county executive of Howard County said he has “great concerns” about his predecessor’s five-year flood mitigation plan for Ellicott City, and says demolishing 10 historic buildings on Main Street could be “counterproductive.”

Democrat Calvin Ball defeated current executive Allan Kittleman (R), who, with County Councilman Jon Weinstein (D), proposed an aggressive plan to protect public safety in August, after the second “1,000 year flood” in two years devastated Main Street.

As a council member, Ball voted against the current five-year plan, which will allow the county to borrow almost $16 million and transfer almost $17 million from money designated for other projects. It also calls for the purchase and demolition of one building on upper Main Street, and two in the upstream Valley Mede neighborhood.

In an interview, Ball said he will have several goals for flood mitigation when he takes office.

Kittleman and Weinstein have said in addition to building water retention facilities to slow streams flowing down Main Street in the former mill town, and widening the channel that snakes through and under buildings, 10 buildings must be demolished to allow water to flow into the Patapsco River, which runs perpendicular to lower Main Street.

“I want to make sure people feel safe in Ellicott City, work toward getting as much of the floodwater off the street as quickly as possible, while still preserving the historic character and nature that makes Ellicott City a destination,” Ball said.

“I think taking away a lot of the things that people (want to visit in) Ellicott City is counterproductive, if that’s not something that we have to do,” Ball.

Ball has told WTOP his staff will be “evaluating all viable options” to lessen the threat to people and property.

Four people died in Ellicott City during the 2016 and 2018 floods.

Asked if Kittleman and Weinstein’s plan erred on the side of safety, Ball said: “I had great concerns. I want to ensure we have a plan that not only respects the taxpayer dollar and makes it safe, but also, as much as possible, preserves the historic character of Ellicott City.”

Kittleman and Weinstein (who lost in the Democratic primary) had cited public safety as the primary goal of their plan, and said years of research and smaller tweaks had not lowered the risk of potentially fatal flooding.

Ball said he will seeking guidance — and funding — from state and federal agencies, including the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.

“I want to make sure that, to the extent possible, we can meet all of our goals, which include preserving the historic nature of some of those buildings,” he said.

Click here to see the article on the WTOP website.

© 2018 WTOP. All Rights Reserved.


Our stories may be republished online or in print under Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. We ask that you edit only for style or to shorten, provide proper attribution and link to our website. Please see our republishing guidelines for use of photos and graphics.

If you have any questions, please email editor Danielle Gaines at [email protected].

To republish, copy the following text and paste it into your HTML editor.


Creative Commons License AttributionCreative Commons Attribution
Razing Ellicott City Buildings Could Be ‘Counterproductive,’ Ball Says